
Start with a verifiable identity
Record the legal entity, business location, contact details, quotation entity, and payment beneficiary. Differences should be explained before payment.
Confirm who the buyer is dealing with
Record the Chinese legal name, unified social credit code, registration status, registered address, stated business scope, contact person, quotation entity, invoice entity, contract entity, and payment beneficiary. Search the official National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System using the Chinese name or credit code. A valid registration supports identity checking but does not by itself prove capacity, quality, solvency, or future performance.
Explain differences between the company shown on a marketplace page, business license, quotation, contract, invoice, and bank account. Some differences may have a legitimate commercial explanation, but the buyer should understand it before payment. Independently verify unexpected bank-detail changes through a previously known contact channel.
Assess product and cooperation fit
| Area | Questions | Possible evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Product | Has the supplier handled comparable materials or functions? | Relevant examples, samples, technical answers |
| Capacity | Can the supplier support the expected quantity and timing? | Production plan, visit, or audit evidence |
| Quality | How are requirements and defects controlled? | Control plan, records, agreed inspection |
| Compliance | Which market documents are claimed and what do they cover? | Reports, declarations, model matrix |
| Commercial | Are MOQ, payment, changes, and remedies clear? | Written quotation and contract terms |
Match the check to the risk
A low-value standard sample and a customized regulated product should not use the same review depth. Consider product safety, intellectual property, tooling ownership, order value, payment exposure, customization, market regulation, launch timing, and the cost of failure. Increase evidence before the commitment increases.
Available tools may include registration review, document clarification, references, samples, video calls, China-side visits, formal factory audits, laboratory testing, pre-production review, and pre-shipment inspection. Each answers a different question. Define the scope and acceptance basis instead of using the word verified without explanation.
Supplier screening reduces uncertainty. It does not create a guarantee or replace a well-written commercial agreement.
Before deposit or production release
- The legal, contract, invoice, and payment entities are understood.
- The approved product and packaging references are version controlled.
- MOQ, price, tooling, payment, lead time, delivery term, and change process are written.
- Required audit, test, document, sample, or inspection gates are defined.
- The buyer knows who approves changes and what evidence is required for balance payment or shipment.
Separate identity, capability, and performance
Identity answers who the legal and payment parties are. Capability addresses whether the supplier appears able to make the required product under the expected conditions. Performance concerns what the supplier actually does during the buyer's project. A business license can support identity, a factory visit can provide capability evidence, and order milestones can reveal performance; none of them answers all three questions alone.
Use consistent names across research records. Chinese legal names are more reliable for official searches than translated brand names. Save the source, search date, and the information observed. If an official record changes or a document cannot be reconciled with the quotation and payment request, stop and clarify before increasing exposure.
- Identity: legal entity, address, status, representatives, and payment path.
- Capability: product experience, people, process, equipment, documents, and capacity evidence.
- Performance: response accuracy, sample result, change control, timing, and order evidence.
Treat warning signs as questions requiring evidence
Warning signs can include inconsistent company names, unexplained third-party payment, pressure to bypass normal review, refusal to provide basic written information, copied or mismatched documents, unrealistic prices or lead times, and constant changes to the product basis. A warning sign is not always proof of misconduct, but it should change the next action from trust to clarification.
Ask for the missing explanation and supporting evidence, then independently verify material facts where possible. Reduce payment exposure, require a sample or visit, use milestone evidence, or obtain professional due diligence if the risk remains important. The buyer may decide that the time and cost of further checking exceed the value of keeping the option.
The purpose of screening is to support an informed commitment, including the decision not to continue.
Assess fit for this product
- Relevant product experience and examples.
- Ability to answer technical and packaging questions.
- MOQ, timing, and customization fit.
- Willingness to provide documents or arrange samples.
Choose evidence according to risk
Marketplace history does not prove future performance. Depending on the order, a buyer may need samples, video calls, a visit, an audit, document review, testing, or formal inspection. Keep the approved specification, terms, change process, and responsibilities in writing.
Supplier screening reduces uncertainty; it cannot remove every commercial or production risk.
Official references
State Administration for Market RegulationNational Enterprise Credit Information Publicity SystemU.S. International Trade AdministrationChina market entry and due-diligence considerationsLast reviewed by YIMO Global on August 29, 2026.
General information only. Requirements must be confirmed for the actual product, shipment, destination, current rules, and buyer responsibility.
Related YIMO service